State Police Make Five DUI Arrests
The following arrest information was provided by the Pennsylvania State Police Trevose station. It does not imply conviction.
Between Sept. 6-9, Trevose troopers made the following arrests:
On Sept. 6 at 9:39 p.m., state police stopped a vehicle on I-95 southbound at Exit 44 in Middletown Township. The driver, a 28-year-old man from Yardley, was found to be under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance. He faces DUI charges.
On Sept. 7 at 3:04 a.m., state police stopped a vehicle on I-95 northbound at milepost 42 in Middletown Township. The driver, a 28-year-old man from Penns Grove, NJ, was found to be under the influence of alcohol and faces DUI charges.
On Sept. 8 at 1 a.m., state police stopped a vehicle for speeding on I-95 northbound at milepost 34.8 in Bensalem. The driver, a 44-year-old female from Philadelphia, was found to be intoxicated and faces DUI charges in district court.
On Sept. 8 at 3:22 a.m., state police stopped a vehicle for speeding on I-95 southbound at milepost 34.8 in Bensalem. The driver, a 33-year-old female from Trenton, was found to be under the influence of alcohol and faces DUI charges in district court.
On Sept. 9 at 3:22 a.m., state police stopped a vehicle for speeding on I-95 in Bensalem. The driver, a 36-year-old man from Bensalem, was found to be intoxicated and arrested for DUI.
What do you think?
Tell us in the comments.
Connie Youmans
8:17 am on Monday, September 10, 2012
Why don't they report the names of the offenders anymore?
Jerry Brahm
9:01 am on Monday, September 10, 2012
The police still report the names, but sometimes in misdemeanor cases, such as DUIs, the test results after arrest do not indicate drunkenness, or the arrest is overturned or even a conviction can be expunged. For those reasons, Patch often withholds names in misdemeanors unless all the information on each case is available or the circumstances warrant it.
Eric S
9:55 am on Monday, September 10, 2012
I'm fine with the withholding of names. Given that the arrestees are not yet convicted it seems to me that they are due a bit of privacy at this point. On conviction, no privacy at all....such is the price for playing with fire.